“Suppose for example you’re a voter and you have candidate X and you have candidate Y. Candidate X agrees with you on everything but you don’t think that person can deliver on anything. Candidate Y disagrees with you on half the issues but you believe that on the other half, the candidate will be able to deliver. For whom will you vote?
This is the kind of question that I predict — and this has nothing to do with what’s going on now — but I am just saying if you look at five, 10, 15 years from now, you may actually see this delivery issue become a serious issue in Democratic debates because it is so hard to figure out how to turn good intentions into real changes in the lives of the people we represent.”
Hey! Where the White Women At?
In an election year that has become increasingly dull since the departure of Hillary Clinton, it seems that the fun is actually getting ramped up again with the introduction of Steve Schmidt into the McCain campaign. Schmidt was one of the architects (along with Karl Rove) of the 2004 George W. Bush re-election campaign that produced some of the sleaziest most entertaining moments in modern campaign history.
It seems Schmidt’s presence in the campaign is lighting a much-needed fire under the asses of the McCain camp the way Maggie Williams did for Hillary with the "kitchen sink". But with the mainstream media so firmly in the tank for The Messiah, providing him with 24-hour non-stop coverage, what else is the man to do for some airtime?
Bob Herbert wrote an opinion piece for The New York Times, Running While Black, slamming the newly invigorated McCain campaign for its latest political ad, "Celebrity". While trying to be critical of McCain’s new tactics, Herbert merely solidifies my earliest assumption that Obama and his media minions have been playing the race card all along. Only now, they are becoming more obvious about it. Here is the opening paragraph to Herbert’s piece:
Gee, I wonder why, if you have a black man running for high public office — say, Barack Obama or Harold Ford — the opposition feels compelled to run low-life political ads featuring tacky, sexually provocative white women who have no connection whatsoever to the black male candidates.
You’ve got to be kidding me, Bob. The first thing you think about when you see those two women are the fact that they don’t wear panties? And did you just use the word "slimy" in reference to two women without underwear? The innuendoes are really flying out there, Bob.
Dude, close the laptop, grab your jacket, and procede to the nearest bar. You’ve got some serious internal issues. I suggest you start off with four Martini’s and just keep pounding them till all this blows over. Did you pick up on my subliminal message for you in the previous sentence? That’s right, better find an ATM…

- I am racist. I hate white people.
- Bald men are eeee-vil.
- Steve Schmidt is gay. Those are his lovers.
- All three pictures are of the same guy. Good days, bad days.
- Lord Voldemort needs to see his dentist. Therefore, so does Steve Schmidt.
- Barack Obama is gay. I don’t know why, he just is.
- Fasten your seatbelts. The McCain campaign is about to kick some serious ass.
White resentment, the product of Affirmative Action, is partially founded by an elite media culture who insists that so-called blue-collar whites are all racist (which is why they supported Hillary Clinton), when in fact, they are not. It is impossible to disprove a negative — they have no badge to flash and prove this. So when these voters in West Virginia and Kentucky are immediately branded as racist because they do not support Barack Obama, and Obama never bothers to defend them against the media smear tactics, the resentment begins to intensify. Perhaps they are even one step closer to becoming the full-blown racists they are already accused of being. Apparently, this is of no concern to Barack Obama, but if the country can learn to come together since the Civil Rights Act of 1964, surely we can grow apart again just as fast.
Another cause of white resentment is hypocrisy. Barack Obama says he believes a constitutional amendment to bar preferential treatment by public entities on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin is "divisive". Yet after six months of using his own race as a weapon against such stalwart Democrats as Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro (who have spent their entire political lives fighting for racial equality) by inferring that their comments in opposition to his candidacy were racist, he has shown us time and time again he is far more concerned with winning the election than he is in healing the racial wounds in America.
Hypocrisy also exists in Black Entertainment Television, Ebony magazine, Obama’s black separatist church, and the Congressional Black Caucus, leaving many white Americans scratching their heads as to why an unqualified black candidate should be given the keys to the White House simply as a token of our apologies for the last 200 years when "the playing field" already has an incline like the side of the Matterhorn.



