The bloggers are going crazy over the Veepstakes it seems. A McCain Democrat’s Journal recently posted an article inviting readers to put in their 2 cents about who McCain’s selection might or should be. I started to write a comment then realized, as usual, I was going a bit too long, so I decided instead to post it here:
#1 — Hillary Clinton: Talk about bold. The problem would no longer be about winning, but what to do after he won. She would bring a quarter of the Democratic Party with her. In fact, she would make the current fracture in the Democratic Party permanent. Sure, the Conservatives would scream bloody murder, but no other VP choice can almost guarantee a McCain victory. There is no doubt in my mind Hillary could. The benefits are plentiful:
- Stop Obama. Both the Republicans and the Clintons would like nothing more than to put Barack Obama out of commission for the next 4-8 years. Maybe permanently. The hallucinagenic qualities of his candidacy will undoubtedly be gone after this year, and losing is a great way to begin deflating his magic. In the so-called "year of the Democrats", Hillary may be the only one who can put McCain over the top.
- Fractured Parties. The Republican Party is just as fractured as the Democrats. Reagan Conservatives already believe the party has been hijacked by the moderate McCain/Lieberman wing. Rush Limbaugh believes McCain is the presumptive nominee only because Independents tainted the waters, so right-wing enthusiasm is lukewarm right now, at best. Most believe the best option is to vote for McCain only as an anti-Obama measure to buy some time before a true Reagan Conservative like Bobby Jindal can take back the party. McCain/Clinton is better than Obama/Bore.
- Hillary’s Ticking Clock. Hillary Clinton knows she has 50% of the Democrat voters behind her, but the radical Obama/Pelosi/Dean wing is currently set to grab power away from the Clintons once and for all. Make no mistake, Hillary knows exactly who her friends are now, and the numbers get smaller by the day. Politics is about power, and the Clintons are fast becoming yesterday’s news. She knows this. Also, at 60, she has only about two (maybe three) more elections in her. In 2012 she will be 64, but if Obama wins this year he will be the party favorite. That leaves 2016. Does Hillary have that much patience? Not likely.
- McCain’s Ticking Clock. This is John McCain’s last chance to be President, and he is following George W. Bush and running against The Messiah. Rotten luck. With Hillary’s help he will win, then she will win. After all, what are friends for?
Of course critics seem to be knocking McCain/Clinton for the same reason they knock Obama/Hagel, but with both parties in chaos and a campaign template set for non-partisan politics, change, and reaching across the aisle… anything is possible. In politics, power is the ultimate God, party loyalty is a distant second, and patriotism runs dead last.
I realize there is a snowball’s chance in hell of this happening, but I believe that conservatives already don’t like John McCain all that much, but still prefer him to Obama. This election year seems to be Obama or Not Obama. John McCain is already considered a maverick, his close friend Joe Lieberman is one as well. Hillary has actually gained some respect from Republicans who used to fear her, and the Democratic Party has all but abandoned her along with the mainstream media. Psychologically, she is already an Independent to her loyal followers and compared with Obama, she’s looking a lot more moderate.
We’ll just have to wait and see…




I like it, mainly because there isn’t a chance in Hell I’ll vote for Obama and will already be holding my nose to vote for McCain. With Hillary on the ticket, it would be even easier. And it might even more moderate a McCain presidency. There is plenty of danger, though. One is that republicans won’t like the ticket, thus not voting for it or staying home. The other is that to party democrats, Hillary will be seen as a betrayer and they’ll work against her. I don’t know if either is true. But they are definitely issues.
Comment by CognitiveDissonance — July 22, 2008 @ 1:23 am
Check out Bonnie Erbe’s article on Obama’s Fundraising Hypocrisy
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2008/7/21/
Comment by Garrett — July 22, 2008 @ 7:37 pm
Hey Pyro - hope I didn’t offend you with my goof comment the other day
You’re right that Hillary is old news, though - I continue to assume that Socks will take out a hit on Obama clearing the path for her nomination. There’s just too much at stake for the Bush/Clinton dynasties. Bush Sr./Bill/GW/Hillary/Jeb/Chelsea…
Way too much despair for Clinton lovers - trust that the “power that be” will not relinquish control.
It’s simply a matter of timing - and I’m certain there’s still a great deal of consternation over her gaffe on RFK being assassinated
So you will get McCain/Clinton - only it will be McCain v. Clinton.
Silly sheep and their faith in our faux democracy - when will they ever learn?
Comment by Billy Jay — July 23, 2008 @ 1:38 pm
Also, quick note to Big Brother.
I’m not saying it’s a good thing that Obama will get RFK’d - I’m just saying that much more powerful people have had their careers… uhm, derailed… in the greater interest of our corporate-controlled, elitist two party system.
Hillary made a VERY stupid comment, so she has to pull off a convincing BFF with Obama. Then it’ll be back to business as usual.
Historians will probably formally declare America having become an aristodemocracy following Chelsea’s reign.
Political dynasties RULE! Literally. And no silly Obama “trend” will be allowed to upset that plan. Not happening.
Comment by Billy Jay — July 23, 2008 @ 1:50 pm