Michael Kinsley of Time magazine vents his frustration with the PUMAs in a new essay, Divided They Fall, that was meant to be a scolding for all us naughty Clinton holdouts, but actually better serves as an expose of what is fatally wrong with the DNC and their media stooges. Kinsley is so out of touch with the American voter, I will have to break the article down piece by piece:

1. The one-on-one rivalry between Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama lasted only about three months from beginning to end. Their policy disagreements are negligible.

It’s true their policy similarities are uncanny, but many Hillary Clinton supporters have long held the notion that Barack Obama simply went to her website, copied her platform, then pasted them onto his own page…

2. For many Clinton supporters, the chance to elect an African-American President represents the culmination of a cause they have been fighting for all their lives.

Actually, many Democrats aren’t interested in propelling a skin tone to the White House just to be symbolic. If that were the case, Jesse Jackson would have been the party nominee in the 80s. The cause that we have been fighting for is to have an education system and a non-racist national environment that allows a qualified minority to get elected. Barack Obama is simply not qualified.

3. What is their problem?

If a single question posed by the party elites can possibly represent all the outrage NObama Democrats are feeling toward the media and party leaders, this would be it.

It is important to note that we are not the ones who have a problem. You are. It is your job to find out what we the voters want for our country, then offer up a candidate who will best serve those needs. Somewhere along the line, you got it backward. We chose Hillary Clinton. You chose Barack Obama. It’s that simple.

This year’s primary race was close only because the DNC’s proportional delegate system is seriously corrupt. Many of Obama’s wins came from caucuses that in no way represents the voice of the people. Take Texas as a prime example: Hillary won by nearly 100,000 votes, yet Obama took more delegates.

No one wants to admit to the fact that the superdelegates put Obama over the top only because they feared a backlash with black voters. Barack Obama ran a historical campaign based on voter intimidation and the fear of being labeled a racist, and it worked. Look at what the Obama campaign did to Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro. Shame on you, Barack Obama.

4. News reports suggest that disgruntled Clinton supporters are angry about alleged sexism in the coverage of her campaign, while other Democrats are upset at Obama’s recent moves toward the center. The second complaint is childish. Securing your base and then moving to the center is the fundamental move of politics, like the basic steps of the fox-trot.

Wow. Where do I start? Did you just call me disgruntled? You see, Kinsley, the fact of the matter is that I am a unique individual first, an American second, and a Democrat by chance. It’s true that I was angry a few weeks ago, but I’ve since collected myself. I refuse to vote for Barack Obama because he does not represent what I believe to be the appropriate path for our country. Not only are his true political leanings too extreme for my taste, but I don’t appreciate a man who exploits the black experience for political gain. Especially when he grew up in Hawaii and got a free ticket to Harvard.

Alleged sexism? OK. This therapy session appears to be going nowhere. As long as you continue to deny the obvious, we will not be able to move forward. This is part of your problem.

As far as moving toward the center, it is nothing more than appeasement to get votes, and even though you think of it as a tradition common in general elections, voters tend to see it differently: They are lies. This is why Americans despise politicians. Obama promised he was different, he is not.

5. And Obama is hardly responsible for Clinton’s press coverage. But there is no easy way these folks can vent their anger at Chris Matthews. So they are taking their revenge on people without health care, women who need abortions, and others who they (if they supported Hillary) must think will be harmed by a Republican victory in the fall. That’ll show ‘em.

If Barack Obama cannot denounce sexist campaign coverage the way Hillary Clinton was expected to denounce any sign of racism, then Obama is even less qualified to be the world leader than I suspect. And stop dangling Roe v. Wade over our heads because George W. Bush appointee Chief Justice John Roberts revealed before his confirmation that he has no intentions of overturning the landmark precedent. Even if it was overturned, the decision would be based on the fact that abortions have absolutely nothing to do with interstate commerce, therefore the choice would fall back onto the states. So don’t you worry, Kinsley, your girlfriends are safe with McCain.

Finally:

6. In the case of Hillary Clinton’s erstwhile supporters, all of these feelings seem overwrought to me. But there is no point in arguing about this, or at least not now. Now is the time to just get over it…

Sorry, no deal. You can continue to use language describing us as "disgruntled" and "overwrought" all you want, but the truth of the matter is we know exactly what we are doing. In fact, the suggestion that PUMAs are only women who act upon their bitter emotions is yet another example of the rampant sexism throughout this campaign. Wake up! We are 2 million strong and we are not going away.