2008 General Election:posted by: Political Pyro
July 31, 2008 at 12:29 pm
John McCain recently revealed in an interview with George Stephanopoulos that he supported the proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution that would ban "preferential treatment" on the basis of "race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin." Barack Obama immediately fired back saying he was "disappointed" in McCain’s position.
 
"You know, the truth of the matter is, these are not designed to solve a big problem, but they’re all too often designed to drive a wedge between people," Obama said speaking to a conference of minority journalists.
 
With this statement, yet again, Barack Obama displays his concern with speeches over action — design over finished product. The sinister intentions of the architects of this referendum are about as relevant to the law as what they had for breakfast that morning or what color tie they were sporting. The truth of the matter is, Senator Obama, the proposed amendment advocates total equality — something you do not advocate as you pander to the minority voter.                                                                
 
As a white man, I do not pretend to understand first-hand the hardship of minorities. However, what I do understand is that poverty and hardship have no racial preference. The white perception of "leveling the playing field" more often than not results in a growing resentment toward a privileged few who are given preferential treatment with college loans or government jobs based on sex, religion, or skin color.
 
White resentment can be thought of as a social purgatory between the heaven of total assimilation of all Americans and the Hell of racism and segregation. White resentment is often confused with racism, yet resentment toward the preferential treatment of minorities is not usually harbored by high-powered lawyers or brokers living in New York City or Washington D.C. They are harbored in trailers in Kentucky or Arkansas, or in modest homes in the suburbs by working-class whites simply trying to make ends meet. Their frustration comes not from money (or lack of), not from some irrational disdain for dark-colored skin, but from the lack of equal opportunity. The divisive wedge, Senator Obama, is not equality for all but the antiquated notion that some people are more deserving than others. That wedge is Affirmative Action.

 
White resentment, the product of Affirmative Action, is partially founded by an elite media culture who insists that so-called blue-collar whites are all racist (which is why they supported Hillary Clinton), when in fact, they are not. It is impossible to disprove a negative — they have no badge to flash and prove this. So when these voters in West Virginia and Kentucky are immediately branded as racist because they do not support Barack Obama, and Obama never bothers to defend them against the media smear tactics, the resentment begins to intensify. Perhaps they are even one step closer to becoming the full-blown racists they are already accused of being. Apparently, this is of no concern to Barack Obama, but if the country can learn to come together since the Civil Rights Act of 1964, surely we can grow apart again just as fast.

Another cause of white resentment is hypocrisy. Barack Obama says he believes a constitutional amendment to bar preferential treatment by public entities on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin is "divisive". Yet after six months of using his own race as a weapon against such stalwart Democrats as Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro (who have spent their entire political lives fighting for racial equality) by inferring that their comments in opposition to his candidacy were racist, he has shown us time and time again he is far more concerned with winning the election than he is in healing the racial wounds in America.

Hypocrisy also exists in Black Entertainment Television, Ebony magazine, Obama’s black separatist church, and the Congressional Black Caucus, leaving many white Americans scratching their heads as to why an unqualified black candidate should be given the keys to the White House simply as a token of our apologies for the last 200 years when "the playing field" already has an incline like the side of the Matterhorn.   

Jesse Jackson popularized the term "African-American" in the 1980s, and by doing so drove a wedge between black people and the rest of America who were clearly on the road to healing. To advocate the construction of a mental wall — or hyphen — that separates black Americans from the rest of the country is the sort of action one would expect from a race hustler who makes his living by stoking the fires while pretending to fight to extinguish them. Such divisive actions are even more deplorable when advanced by a presidential candidate willing to stoke the fires in order to quench his thirst for power by winning the White House.
 
To his credit, Barack Obama spoke out against Jesse Jackson’s miserable failures as a model for young, black Americans by lashing out at unmarried fathers who shun responsibility and desert their families. But by continuing to restrain the rest of the nation in verbal shackles anytime we speak out against his candidacy, by allowing his opposition to be labeled as racists, and by allowing other forms of discrimination to be used against his opponents (think about his silence toward the sexism used against Hillary Clinton, or his continued use of the word "confused" when referring to John McCain), Barack Obama continues to show us that he isn’t interested in equality at all.
 
Barack Obama has used his historical candidacy as the self-proclaimed unifier to do nothing but pick at America’s racial scab anytime it benefits his quest for the White House. Sexism and ageism be damned. The calendar-driven Barack Obama only speaks out against racism, and only then if it helps him win the White House (And it happens to be Father’s Day. Or he’s busted over Rev. Jeremiah Wright.) while the rest of the nation remains enslaved. By continuing to ignore the plight of the rest of America, Barack Obama is showing himself to be nothing more than another "black candidate" with the same black centrist goals — Jesse Jackson in a brand-new suit.
 
This country is much too diverse for Jackson/Obama-style tunnel-vision politics. The presidency is too important to hand over to a self-serving race-baiter promoting the agenda of just a precious selected few. This type of hypocrisy is the root of white resentment in America, and Barack Obama simply couldn’t care less. Onward to the White House.
2008 General Election:posted by: Political Pyro
July 23, 2008 at 12:43 pm

The state of Maryland, affectionately referred to as "The Nanny State" by most residents here, is a prime example in a microcosm of what the entire country will be like under a Marxist Obama administration with a Democratic majority in Congress. Because Maryland has been monopolized by the Democrats since the beginning of time (the single exception being 4 years of a powerless Republican Gov. Bob Ehrlich) you can witness here the true fruition of the radical wing of the liberal agenda gone unchecked.

 
The leftist agenda to a college student living in Iowa or Texas might seem like the stuff that dreams are made of. Radical ideas always sound great when you are reading about them in a book, but rarely do people take into consideration the Law of Unintended Consequences. So, rather than ride out the next 3 months until you can cast your vote for Barack Obama, I suggest you simply pack your tie-dyed shirts and Patchouli, and move to Maryland. As a matter of fact, I think an off-campus semester in Maryland should be a general college requirement for any newly registered Democrat in college. Rather than inflict your vision onto the rest of the country, simply move to where it is already in action…
 
Want a taste of what universal government programs will be like under a President Obama? Visit your local MVA. Car insurance is mandatory here, so if you miss a monthly payment by a single day, you will owe the state $175. Why such an unnecessarily high penalty for a one day lapse? Don’t ask questions. Government is looking out for you.
 
Nevermind that you only missed the payment because you are poor, you are now even poorer. Talk about kicking someone when they are down! But don’t ask questions. In Maryland, rent comes first, then utilities, then car insurance, then money owed to the state, then gas, then food if possible. Get it straight.
 
Since most of us Marylanders in the "middle-class" are living paycheck to paycheck, you might find that you miss a payment from time to time. This is unacceptable. More penalties will be applied to you. If you stay here long enough, you might find out you owe the state maybe $800 or more so better set up a payment plan…
 
You can’t do this over the phone or on the internet, you have to visit the main office. Not the branch 2 minutes down the road, either. The main office. You see, a lot of people have jobs that require justification, so you have to experience their expertise first-hand.
 
Have a question you want to ask someone over the phone? Give MVA a call. In 15 minutes, you will be speaking to an operator. Don’t like the answer to your question? Call back in an hour and speak with a different operator, she will give you a completely different answer. That’s how the operators are when you call the MVA. Don’t waste your time, it’s all a mind trick. Just proceed to the main office…  
 
Once inside the main office, you will see maybe 50 employees behind computer screens in various places dotted around the massive room. (Students, pretend Barack Obama is President and this is an emergency room) Each station represents a singular issue you may have… three issues = three stations. Don’t try to be sneaky either, and get three different numbers for all three stations at once. They don’t play like that here…
 
Sometimes, you will run into a situation where you haven’t fully explained yourself to the Information Desk. Afterall, those people are the equivilant to Wal-mart greeters, so you may discover you have waited for an hour in the wrong line. Understand, this is your fault.
 
You are at Desk C for example when actually, you should have taken a number for Desk A and Desk B respectively before you can visit Desk C. "Well, can I do the C part now and then get in line for A and B later?" you might ask. No! You must follow the rules. You must go in the proper order. This is for your protection…
 
Once you’ve mastered the ways of the MVA, no doubt you will never make the same mistakes on your next trip. Because you are already living paycheck to paycheck, the addition of a new monthly payment to your budget for insurance violations will strain your budget even more, so the likelihood of your return is pretty damn high.
 
You might even get a little cocky in the future as you calmly explain to the blue-haired lady at the information desk that she is in fact wrong, and that your particular issue should lead you to line 347B rather than 265A. Afterall, line 265A is for pigeon-toed left-handed hookers with title issues…
 
To experience the MVA is to experience government bureaurocracy at its best, not worst. Hours of driving time, waiting in lines, and mountains of paperwork are what you should realistically expect from a government-run entity. What takes you hours to do on a day you had to take off work, you soon realize that a company like Bank of America could do for you in five minutes over the phone…
 
Government service is not based on a workforce of efficiency or greatness, their liberal bleeding hearts are too big for that. Their workers are almost always the down-trodden and malfeasants of our society who are paid big bucks for a single-issue position. More money, less work. Instead of one skilled worker designed to take care of your every need at a single terminal, government makes you do all the work by taking numbers and waiting in lines to compensate for their lack of intelligence, and their need to justify hiring more workers.
 
By requiring newly registered Democrat students to live in the state of Maryland, progressive utopia that it is, they should soon realize that government isn’t designed to work for you at all. You will be the one doing all the work.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2008 General Election:posted by: Political Pyro
July 21, 2008 at 9:05 pm

The bloggers are going crazy over the Veepstakes it seems. A McCain Democrat’s Journal recently posted an article inviting readers to put in their 2 cents about who McCain’s selection might or should be. I started to write a comment then realized, as usual, I was going a bit too long, so I decided instead to post it here:

As a Democrat, my gut tells me that Hillary Clinton will not be Obama’s choice as many voters hope or fear. Hillary has already started setting the stage for 2012 by writing to her top contributors. Although this move is supposedly intended to finance her re-election for the Senate, most of us have read between the lines: It’s not.
 
Anyone Obama chooses should be of no concern to Republicans. Barack Obama is in a serious pickle when it comes to his VP selection. He needs to pick "experience" to offset his own single-sheet resume, so the only option is an old party troll like Sam Nunn or Joe Biden.                                    
 
Of course, Obama/Edwards would look better on the cover of Rolling Stone the way Clinton/Gore did in 1992, but since Edwards was dead in the water four years ago with John Kerry, there is no reason to believe he would be anything other than that now. And of course, any female other than Hillary Clinton would only draw unwanted flashbacks of Hillary herself, so they are out as well. So Obama/Bore it will be… 
 
McCain is certainly the candidate in a position to make an extremely bold choice. The bolder, the better, I think. His degree of boldness will not only highlight the Obama/Bore ticket as being upside down the way Kennedy/Johnson was (or Bush/Cheney for that matter) but will also help serve as a lightning rod against the pundits’ rumbles concerning his age. McCain’s VP should emulate Obama the way Obama’s will emulate McCain: The politics of neutralization. Here are my two bold picks:
 
 
 
#2 — Bobby Jindal: This guy is the Republican’s best antidote to Barack Obama. He is young, intelligent, ambitious, and best of all, a man of color. (I know, it sounds shallow, but there’s a lot of that going around these days) He makes the conservatives happy, and his youth might just help change the Republican brand from being a country club for old white men to a party of diversity. Of course his age is noted as being his biggest weekness, but any criticism by the Obama campaign is certain to highlight Obama’s own relative youth and inexperience. Newt Gingrich can’t seem to brag about Jindal enough. As a VP, Jindal will be seen as a fledgling under the protective wings of the Republican Party to be seasoned and vetted, not a roll of the dice like the Democrats are offering up for the most powerful job on Earth.

 

#1 — Hillary Clinton: Talk about bold. The problem would no longer be about winning, but what to do after he won. She would bring a quarter of the Democratic Party with her. In fact, she would make the current fracture in the Democratic Party permanent. Sure, the Conservatives would scream bloody murder, but no other VP choice can almost guarantee a McCain victory. There is no doubt in my mind Hillary could. The benefits are plentiful:

 
  • Stop Obama. Both the Republicans and the Clintons would like nothing more than to put Barack Obama out of commission for the next 4-8 years. Maybe permanently. The hallucinagenic qualities of his candidacy will undoubtedly be gone after this year, and losing is a great way to begin deflating his magic. In the so-called "year of the Democrats", Hillary may be the only one who can put McCain over the top.
  • Fractured Parties. The Republican Party is just as fractured as the Democrats. Reagan Conservatives already believe the party has been hijacked by the moderate McCain/Lieberman wing. Rush Limbaugh believes McCain is the presumptive nominee only because Independents tainted the waters, so right-wing enthusiasm is lukewarm right now, at best. Most believe the best option is to vote for McCain only as an anti-Obama measure to buy some time before a true Reagan Conservative like Bobby Jindal can take back the party. McCain/Clinton is better than Obama/Bore. 
  • Hillary’s Ticking Clock. Hillary Clinton knows she has 50% of the Democrat voters behind her, but the radical Obama/Pelosi/Dean wing is currently set to grab power away from the Clintons once and for all. Make no mistake, Hillary knows exactly who her friends are now, and the numbers get smaller by the day. Politics is about power, and the Clintons are fast becoming yesterday’s news. She knows this. Also, at 60, she has only about two (maybe three) more elections in her. In 2012 she will be 64, but if Obama wins this year he will be the party favorite. That leaves 2016. Does Hillary have that much patience? Not likely.
  • McCain’s Ticking Clock. This is John McCain’s last chance to be President, and he is following George W. Bush and running against The Messiah. Rotten luck. With Hillary’s help he will win, then she will win. After all, what are friends for?

Of course critics seem to be knocking McCain/Clinton for the same reason they knock Obama/Hagel, but with both parties in chaos and a campaign template set for non-partisan politics, change, and reaching across the aisle… anything is possible. In politics, power is the ultimate God, party loyalty is a distant second, and patriotism runs dead last.

I realize there is a snowball’s chance in hell of this happening, but I believe that conservatives already don’t like John McCain all that much, but still prefer him to Obama. This election year seems to be Obama or Not Obama. John McCain is already considered a maverick, his close friend Joe Lieberman is one as well. Hillary has actually gained some respect from Republicans who used to fear her, and the Democratic Party has all but abandoned her along with the mainstream media. Psychologically, she is already an Independent to her loyal followers and compared with Obama, she’s looking a lot more moderate.

We’ll just have to wait and see…