2008 General Election:posted by: Political Pyro
August 28, 2008 at 8:40 am

“Candidate X”

Years ago, one of my college professors laid out a map of Paris on an overhead projector and then aligned with it a map of the constellation. The result was a near perfect fusion of monuments and stars in an uncanny synchronicity that awakened students’ eyes to the possibility that Paris had been built as a monument to the Heavens. The map of Paris was in fact a map of the stars with as much architectural perfection as the great pyramids or Stonehenge. Was my professor’s revelation accurate?
 
No. My political science professor was a master of deception. He played with our minds only to prove to us that despite our relative intelligence, we can be played.
 
A map of Paris with thousands of dots will undoubtedly match up to a map with billions. To prove his point at the end of the great head game, he simply moved one of the maps over an inch to show that they aligned again.
 
Politics is about deception. More accurately, it is about winning, and deception is a vital key. 
 
Recently, political master, Bill Clinton, said the following:

“Suppose for example you’re a voter and you have candidate X and you have candidate Y. Candidate X agrees with you on everything but you don’t think that person can deliver on anything. Candidate Y disagrees with you on half the issues but you believe that on the other half, the candidate will be able to deliver. For whom will you vote?

This is the kind of question that I predict — and this has nothing to do with what’s going on now — but I am just saying if you look at five, 10, 15 years from now, you may actually see this delivery issue become a serious issue in Democratic debates because it is so hard to figure out how to turn good intentions into real changes in the lives of the people we represent.”

Clearly, Bill Clinton is referring to Obama and McCain although within the same breath he denies it. What was the point of saying this in the first place? Many pundits have been wondering. My initial thought was that Clinton actually wants McCain to win so his wife can run in 2012.
 
But, with deeper analysis, I note that McCain in this scenario is "Candidate Y" and Obama is "Candidate X". Is it possible that Bill Clinton was comparing Barack Obama with Malcolm X
Comments (2)
Media Firestorm:posted by: Political Pyro
August 26, 2008 at 12:35 am

The Obama Cover-ups

Listen up, PUMAs! Just in case you are getting a little bit wobbly from the soaring rhetoric at the DNC convention, maybe even falling under the spell of the Obama Kool-Aid or giving in to the call for "unity", I’ve compiled a list of a few sordid details concerning Senator Obama and his growing list of scandals to keep you thinking:
 
 
#1 — Philip Berg
 
On Thursday, Philip Berg filed a temporary restraining order in federal court to bar Obama from running for president, claiming the Democratic candidate was actually born in Africa.
 
"We really don’t believe he was born in Hawaii," Berg said. "We think he was born in Kenya."
 
From The Times-Herald: The Annenberg Political Fact Check, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, aims to expose deception and confusion in U.S. politics. Recently, FactCheck.org staffers "touched, examined and photographed" the original birth certificate kept at the Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago and concluded the document is genuine.
 
Annenberg? Now where have I heard that name before….
 
 
 
#2 — Obama/Ayers/Annenberg
 
From National Review: When Obama made his first run for political office, articles in both the Chicago Defender and Hyde Park Herald featured among his qualifications his position as chairman of the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge — a foundation where Ayers was a founder and guiding force.
 
Obama assumed the Annenberg board chairmanship only months before his first run for office, almost certainly at the behest of Bill Ayers. With a writ to aid Chicago’s public schools, the Annenberg challenge played a deeply political role in Chicago’s education wars, and as board chairman, Obama clearly aligned himself with Ayers’s radical views on education issues.
 
With Obama heading up the board and Ayers heading up the other key operating body of the Annenberg Challenge, the two would have had a close working relationship for years, therefore "exchanging ideas on a regular basis".
 
Associations with radicals seems to be the norm with Barack Obama. Here is another… 
 
                                                                                                          
#3 — Frank Marshall Davis
 
Apparently, the Canadians, the National Enquirer, and a few bloggers are the only ones interested in truly vetting Barack Obama. Canada Free Press has a multitude of information about Obama’s "other mentor" being a member of the Communist Party (see here, here, and here for starters).
 
Also, from Atlas Shrugs: Davis stated that "under certain circumstances I am bisexual" (wait, what?) …"and a voyeur… and an exhibitionist” who was "occasionally mildly interested in sado-masochism", adding: "I have often wished I had two penises to enjoy simultaneously the double – but different – sensations of oral and genital copulation."
 
Davis describes having sex with a 13-year-old girl: "I’m not one to go in for Lolitas. Usually I’d rather not bed a babe under 20. But there are exceptions. I didn’t want to disappoint the trusting child. At her still-impressionistic age, a rejection might be traumatic, could even cripple her sexually for life."           
 
He then described how he and his wife would have sex with the girl. "Anne came up many times the next several weeks, her aunt thinking she was in good hands. Actually she was."

"She obtained a course in practical sex from experienced and considerate practitioners rather than from ignorant insensitive neophytes….I think we did her a favour, although the pleasure was mutual."

Sado-masochistic bisexual Communist pedophile. No scandal here, folks, just a typical mentor… 
 
 
 
# 4 — The Murders of Donald Young, Larry Bland, and Nate Spencer
 
Three openly gay members of Obama’s church were shot execution-style in the back of the head within 40 days of each other late last year. (See here for a good overview). Investigative reporters from The National Enquirer and The Globe have been the only ones (so far) to write anything concerning this scandal. Normally, these ragsheets are immediately dismissed as garbage, but considering that The National Enquirer was the first to expose the John Edwards affair, maybe they deserve a second look.
 
Also, it is interesting to note that Larry Sinclair, a man who says he smoked crack and had oral sex with Barack Obama, and had talked to Donald Young, was arrested in June by the Delaware District Attorney whose name happens to be…
 
 
 
#5 — The Biden Connections
 
…Beau Biden. Name ring a bell? Meet Joe’s son. Is this how you bargain your way into becoming the Vice President, Joe? Nice work, boys.
 

 
Previous Political Pyro articles:
 
 
Comments (6)
Media Firestorm:posted by: Political Pyro
August 11, 2008 at 10:37 pm

She’s Coming Baaaaa-aack!!!

Just when you thought Hillary Clinton was either bound and gagged in Barack Obama’s political crawlspace or onboard the Messiah’s bandwagon, signs that the Clinton political blowtorch is lighting up and ready to burn the house down in Denver are beginning to surface. Here are ten signs of a possible floor fight:
 
1. No Deal: Days before the mainstream media picked up on a video of Hillary at a rally expressing her desire to be placed on the ballot for "healing purposes", PUMA website Just Say No Deal already had it on the front page. Coincidence? Leak? Never underestimate the power of the Clintons. Previous stories had been circulating that Hillary did not want her name on the ballot. This video corrected the error.
 
2. Michigan: In a state Obama cannot afford to lose, much has been written these past few days concerning the ties between jailed Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and Rev. Jeremiah Wright. The timing is curious. Kilpatrick’s arrest has already been covered, but for the first time, a connection to Obama is mentioned. Apparently, some footage exists of Kilpatrick introducing Wright at a NAACP function. Racial tensions in Michigan are among the worst in the country right now and the only reason the mayor has yet to be removed from office is best explained through the words of a Detroit councilwoman: "We don’t want a white governor removing our black mayor." How utterly post-racial. Would the Republicans stoop to use such footage against Obama this fall? Would Hillary? You’d better believe it.
 
3. Colorado: Recent articles have been hinting at a possible GOP plan of attack in the coming weeks: Affirmative Action to be exact. In another state the Obama campaign is hoping to capture this fall, a civil rights initiative is being placed on the ballot that would basically put an end to preferential treatment to minorities. McCain supports it (just as he supports the initiative on the Arizona ballot) while Obama is firmly against it. Prohibition against discrimination? Why, that’s racist! No conspiracy theories here, but Obama should have fun explaining to the folks in Colorado exactly why equality is such a "divisive" issue. More Hillary ammunition just now getting some MSM coverage. She’s jotting this down in her notebook now.
 
4. The Leaked Hillary Memos: Just as Obama is gathering national attention for stalling in the polls in the year of the Democrats, the Clinton campaign seems to have misplaced about 200 memos calling Obama unelectable "except against Attila the Hun", and it just so happens that Andrew Sullivan of Atlantic Monthly has found them. Lucky for the campaign, the memos didn’t fall into the wrong hands… like the New York Times.
 
5. "I Am Not a Racist": John McCain may have cracked open the door when he accused the Obama campaign of playing the Race Card every five minutes against any and all opposition, but Bill Clinton kicked it through the wall by verifying that he too was a victim. Doesn’t exactly sound like a party loyalist to me. Still bitter? Try pissed.
 
6. Howard Wolfson: Hillary’s faithful attack dog comes out of the woodwork with this quote in reference to the mainstream media suppressing the Edwards scandal: "I believe we would have won Iowa, and Clinton today would therefore have been the nominee," former Clinton Communications Director Howard Wolfson told ABCNews. Now what was the point of making that comment? Has his final paycheck not cleared? Or is he still on the payroll? Hmm.
 
7. Edwards Scandal/MSM Backlash: This may not be directly damaging to Obama, but with voters slowly beginning to realize that the mainstream media has been withholding damaging evidence against preferred Democratic candidates, one might suspect that there are untapped stories about Obama as well. Considering that Raila Odinga and ethnic cleansing in Kenya has yet to be brought to national attention, their suspicions would be correct. Surely, both Hillary and McCain are aware of this by now.
 
8. Primetime Convention Speeches: Bill and Hillary have landed two of the hottest primetime spots of the convention. Now, I may be stretching a bit here, but didn’t Bill just accuse Obama of playing the Race Card on him? Why do I doubt either of the Clintons will be able to deliver anything remotely close to an ass-kissing session? Everytime either one of them speaks, I look for smoke signals in the background or for their eyes blinking a Morse code message to the PUMAs. Call me a conspiracy nut, but you might want to make some popcorn for this convention.
 
9. Foreign Conflict: It has been widely noted that any international crisis will inevitably help John McCain. We now have two: Iran and Georgia. So while the McCain campaign is hitting hard on the fact that Barack Obama is nothing more than an empty-headed celebrity, world crises are brewing. Could Hillary Clinton help save the Democrats? Delegates might be wondering that right about now.
 
10. Old Jewish Women: Three strikes! Those are three major thorns in Obama’s side. Put them all together and you have one fierce PUMA. My favorite person in this category is a lady I chat with several times a week at a local coffee shop. Her name is Miss Criss. Criss had a vision that Hillary Clinton would take the Oath of Office. "In 2013?" I ask. "No, in 2009." she still insists. Miss Criss swears up and down that Hillary Clinton will be the next President of the United States. And who am I to doubt her? She reads palms and cures pain with the heat of her fingertips, too.
 
One thing is for certain: win or lose, come August 26th, Hillary Clinton will be ready to pounce. All the signs are there.
 
 
 
Comments (32)